San Diego Law Review

Byrne: Closing hte Gap Between HIPAA and Patient Privacy

Author(s)

Austin Rutherford

Editor(s)

Faculty editor: Larry Alexander

Details

Publication Law Review
Volume 53
Issue 1
Start Page 201
Month March
Year 2016
Type Comment
Subject Area

Abstract

HIPAA’s lack of an individualized remedy harmed individuals and left the law a toothless monster, but Byrne begins to fill the longstanding gap by offering greater protection for individuals and their sensitive information. Byrne will also incentivize better compliance with HIPAA by instilling in companies a fear of sizeable tort suit damage awards.
Part II of this Note introduces HIPAA and its ability to protect sensitive health information. Part III discusses the facts, holding, and reasoning of Byrne, in which a state supreme court, for the first time, recognized HIPAA requirements as a duty owed in negligence claims. Part IV examines the available remedies for injured individuals before and after Byrne. Part V analyzes how the Byrne decision, in combination with HIPAA’s expansion under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH), affects companies subject to HIPAA. Part VI demonstrates that Byrne and other similar state court decisions are trending toward recognizing HIPAA as a standard of care nationwide. Part VII concludes.

Contact:

Academic Journals
Warren Hall, Rooms 124-125
Phone: (619) 260-4531
Fax: (619) 260-7715