San Diego (April 25, 2017) – University of San Diego (USD) School of Law Professor Orly Lobel Quoted in a Utah Business article t…
USD School of Law Professor Orly Lobel's Talent Wants to Be Free Referenced in Various Media Outlets
San Diego (April 25, 2017) – University of San Diego (USD) School of Law Professor Orly Lobel was referenced in several media art…
San Diego (April 24, 2017) – University of San Diego (USD) School of Law alumnus John Morrell, ’84 (JD), was recently …
Vienna (April 7-13, 2017) –338 teams from over 75 countries, including the University of San Diego (USD) School of Law VICAM team…
USD Law Alumnus A. Barry La Forgia ’76 (JD) to Receive Bishop Charles Francis Buddy Award at Alumni Honors
San Diego (April 12, 2017) – The University of San Diego (USD) will honor A. Barry La Forgia, ’76 (JD), with the Bisho…
San Diego (April 7, 2017) - Pranshu Kaushal, '17 (LLM), has a different background than most of his peers. Though he’s currently…
News Center Spotlights
Sign up to receive news updates from USD School of Law via email.
A new book by Professor Orly Lobel exposes the pitfalls of non-compete agreements and other protections companies put into place to safeguard intellectual property. Lobel offers an alternative solution. Read more.
Professor Fox teaches and writes in the areas of health law, medical ethics, reproductive genetics, stem cell research, and neuroscience. Read his articles on HuffingtonPost article.
Official blog for the Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism at the University of San Diego School of Law. The blog follows the expansion of and interest in originalism and is devoted to cataloguing and reviewing developments in this area of constitutional law.
USD’s law summer study abroad programs provide a strong curricular focus. Each program offers a tailored selection of courses tied to an overall academic theme reflecting the academic, legal, economic, and cultural dynamics of that city and region.
In their new book, Professor Michael Rappaport (with John McGinnis) maintain that the Supreme Court should adhere to the text of the Constitution because it was enacted by supermajorities—both its original enactment under Article VII and subsequent amendments under Article V. Read more.